Gandhi, 1982

Rated PG (may be a little lenient)

I thought I’d follow up my last post with another post about a religious and historical film. Interestingly, this is the second year in a row that a film with religious themes won the top honor (following “Chariots of Fire” the year before).

My husband knows practically everything there is to know about me (and vice versa) since I’ve been with him now for more than half of my life. But, when we sat down to watch this Oscar winner, I was surprised that he had never seen this before. He was equally surprised that I had seen this twice already. (How can you NOT have seen “Gandhi”??, I thought.) Thanks to my parents, I saw this when I was young, (actually too young to really appreciate it), but many things stayed with me encouraging me to watch it again when I was an adult. I got even more out of it watching it a third time. I highly recommend this film to anyone; it is a good history lesson in addition to having valuable lessons in servitude, humility, and faith.

This three hour-long epic is the life story of Mohandas K. “Mahatma” Gandhi, a man who became a prominent Indian leader promoting civil disobedience through non-violence. In his early life, Gandhi was an established lawyer in South Africa who helped attain civil rights for Hindis and Muslims through acts of non-violence. Upon returning to impoverished India in 1915, he decides to actively continue his campaign of non-violence and non-cooperation while “fighting” for India’s independence from Britain. He also works for the emancipation of the “untouchables”- the lowest class on the caste system required to clean latrines, sweep, and scavenge. He selflessly forsakes worldly possessions and fasts many times in his life, even to the brink of death. He is imprisoned for political offenses but continues to preach peace and truth and “fight” for a self-sufficient India up until the day he is assassinated in 1948. (As you can see, the film covers a good chunk of time.)

Gandhi is known as “The Father of the Nation” in India and his birthday, October 2^nd, is a national holiday and celebrated worldwide as the International Day of Non-Violence. This is an excerpt of a speech given at Gandhi’s funeral (also in the film): “The object of this massive tribute died as he had always lived - a private man without wealth, without property, without official title or office. Mahatma Gandhi was not a commander of great armies nor ruler of vast lands. He could boast no scientific achievements or artistic gift. Yet men, governments and dignitaries from all over the world have joined hands today to pay homage to this little brown man in the loincloth who led his country to freedom. Pope Pius, the Archbishop of Canterbury, President Truman, Chiang Kai-shek, The Foreign Minister of Russia, the President of France... are among the millions here and abroad who have lamented his passing. In the words of General George C. Marshall, the American Secretary of State, "Mahatma Gandhi had become the spokesman for the conscience of mankind, a man who made humility and simple truth more powerful than empires." And Albert Einstein added, "Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth.” After reading that, who wouldn’t want to see this movie and learn more about this remarkable man!?

There were quite a few terms thrown around in this film that I was naïve to their meanings: Sammie (a derogatory term for an African-American), coon (an offensive term for a black person), kaffir (an insulting term for a black African), coolie (a Hindi word for West-Indian baggage carriers, turned derogatory), and fakir (a Muslim or Hindu who lives solely on alms). I had heard of “coon” before, but all of these words were derogatively used towards Gandhi (an Indian), so that’s why I was confused. Name-calling is so childish; I don’t understand it or have patience for it.

Perhaps I’m being too conservative, but I think this film is violent enough to warrant a PG-13 rating. There are beatings, riots, and open shootings in crowds; that and the subject matter should be saved for someone old enough to understand and handle its meaning.

From its impressive eleven nominations, “Gandhi” walked away with eight awards including a well-deserved Best Actor award for Ben Kingsley. Kingsley became Gandhi. His transformation in looks, mannerisms, and speech is amazing. This winner was up against “E.T. - The Extra-Terrestrial”, “Missing”, “Tootsie”, and “The Verdict”. I am confident that the correct film one; no other competition comes close, even though “E.T.” was clearly the blockbuster hit this year, and I do enjoy that film. (“Gandhi” only grossed one-seventh that of “E.T.”). However, I am very surprised to learn that a very influential movie was left out of this year’s nominations: “Sophie’s Choice”. That is a powerful and emotional film with one very traumatically scarring scene (her choice) that I think should have deserved a nomination. Meryl Streep won one of her three Academy Awards for Best Actress for her portrayal of Sophie (see another one of her award-winning performances in “Kramer vs.Kramer”).

The real Gandhi (very late in his life) and Ben Kingsley…

FAVORITE QUOTES:

Charles Andrews, an English priest and Gandhi’s friend, walks away with him after narrowly escaping a beating by some neighborhood ruffians…

Charles: That was lucky.

Gandhi: I thought you were a man of God.

Charles: I am, but I’m not so egotistical as to think He plans his day around my dilemmas. 

Gandhi: An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.

LESSONS LEARNED:

See last Favorite Quote. Don’t seek revenge; seek forgiveness.

When asked to give the people a message, Gandhi responded, “My life is my message”. Make your life your message. Act and speak the way you want others to, and remember you are all the while teaching younger generations.